MR
EINSTEIN: TRUTHFULNESS:
Some
people are telling lies and repeating lies that they believe are
true, because someone else said something and is believed.
As
a Medium, I was wondering about Mr Einstein, and his soulspirit or
soul or spirit, was in the next-door “plane” or dimension, called
the Borderlands. He communicated, and I asked if there was anything I
could do for him, on a personal note.
He
said: The Rosicrucians are telling lies that Mr Einstein was a
Rosicrucian, Mr Einstein said it was NOT true, that he never
considered joining that cult, regardless of the advertisements that
seem to say that Mr Einstein developed a brilliant mind on his
Rosicrucian membership and practices, no, he developed that
brilliance by pure, good, and much study of mathematics and some
other subjects. Good mental labour is very, very good to keep the
mind fit: tv is the worst for those whom get lazy minds from watching
that, most of it is mindless and lacks reason and intelligence.
Today,
I also remembered something that I had read, and it's an outrage, I
had been told Spiritually that Benjamin Creme, self-styled
“spokesperson for the New Age” was a fake, a fraud, an LSD
addict, whom printed in one of this books that The Lord Jesus Christ
authorised Mr Einstein to do the mathematical calculations to do with
the Hiroshima bomb, and that it was good. In fact, crème is telling
big lies.
The
way I feel about Benjamin Creme is, on this subject: how DARE you,
benjamin crème, imply that the Lord Jesus Christ would authorise the
mass-murder that happened? In fact, about this issue, the truth is:
truman, whom authorised those tests and bombs, was disobedient and
KNEW he was NOT meant to be the President and had had a dream where
GOD told him NOT to be President. And I was told spiritually, that if
truman had NOT disobeyed, then the other candidate would have
negotiated peace with Japan, within 3 weeks and 3 days of
being President, and that was the way GOD wanted the situation dealt
with, that the other candidate would have been such a success, and
that thereby, the nuclear bomb would NOT have been needed in any way.
Creme though, appears to blame The Lord Jesus Christ for that horror.
Mr
Einstein said he just said, about that bomb, in his day, he said: NO,
don't try it. He did NOT do the maths and he did not condone that
weapon of mass destruction. NOR DID THE LORD JESUS CHRIST.
Also
that Mr Einstein said he NEVER flunked or failed at any maths test or
exam, not even once like some believe because some cartoon went on
about that, as a joke. Don't believe it please.
Creme
also has said, and had it printed, that The Lord Jesus Christ and
Madam Blavatsky had “residual karmic debt” so had to suffer. That
was an unfair, outrageous comment, lacking in logic and reason,
because in fact, The Lord Jesus Christ was NOT in debt, he had and
has, huge amounts of karmic merit or spiritual merit, and had never
sinned. If HE had sinned, there could be a debt, but HE is a man of
NO SIN, NO SINS,
Madam
Blavastky whomever her given birth name might be, is nothing short of
a cultist nazi, and I DO have more proof of that, too. She founded
Theosophy and at the ground level, seems to be good, seems to be
wise, but when we look beneath the surface: that's a hidden nazi cult
that recruits people whom have MONEY, and tries later on, to convert
the people to satanism. Also, I'm told if someone looks or seems like
they will tell others about the truth below the surface of Theosophy:
they will be invited to go the Theosophy rooms “for a chat” or
“for a talk, you will be interested” and that in that case,
there's crimes on the minds of those we would say are hard-core
satanists, and even death threats given. Something is wrong with
that, I have had a quick glance at a book in the volumes of “The
Secret Doctrine”, saw one paragraph: and it was about “Why
Lucifer is to be followed”, a distorted ruination, thats' satanism.
And is NOT reasonable, at all, most Christians would say: “but,
that's the devil they follow at Theosophy” and truly, the
Christians got it right.
I
was there, at a meeting because I was told to go there, in a
Spiritual communication, to be quiet, and to look at a book there for
a short while, that I would not be hurt, but, find the proof, and get
home, so I did. Once I found the truth of it, then, I was Spiritually
told do NOT go back there, we did not trick you, you were meant to go
on the Net and tell others, for their own best benefit.
Now
I'm in the position of being able to say to people: NO, don't go near
Theosophy, don't go near their rooms or homes, something is wrong
there. And their newsletters and magazines often have on them, a
small picture near the top, of the nazi swastika, but the hard-core
there explain it all away, as though it's NOT about being Nazi, but,
truly it IS a Nazi Cult: do NOT be decieved, walk away and do not
turn back please.
About
cults, I have also been told Spiritually, do NOT go near or join or
go to meetings at the Masonic Lodge, it's NOT what it seems, do NOT
go there, just walk past if you realise you are walking near their
rooms. It's awful, what they do in there, while looking innocent and
seeming innocent, yet later on it's torture and threats. So, people,
do NOT risk your life and your body by going there. If you want to
tell them to repent, just pray it out and don't bother even writing a
letter to them, they are dangerous, and so are Theosophy. And they
are cunning and believe in telling big lies, they are AWFUL for their
lies, deceits and cunningness.
It's
not against the Law in many nations, to be a satanist even thought
they fully approve of “sex, drugs and rock and roll” all the
time, all at the same time, and that at their parties they organise
crimes for others to do. Something is wrong with the written
agreements some people have been threatened into signing and they
die, months or years later, after signing over all of their property,
bank accounts etc.
WE
WANT A CHANGE OF MIND IN THE LAWBOOKS:
Make proven satanism a criminal offence, due to their crimes, drugs
and all.
AND
that telling lies in public, or in the media, a criminal offence,
since it's written in the Bible, that “do NOT tell lies”. We will
not though take that so far as to say they are to be forbidden by Law
inside a person's home, the problem is: it IS a sin, it IS an
offence, at any time and at all times, but if we asked for in-home
lies to be a criminal offence, the problem would be proof and would
seem to condone what is NOT to happen: in-home surveillance, people's
homes under internal surveillance, and that's an invasion of privacy
so we will say: humankind, do NOT tell lies, anywhere, but the Law
must NOT allow for in-home surveillance, since that breaks privacy
rules. Surveillance in the prisons is at times, ok.
